Grade 6
Build models, establish evidence habits and connect ideas.
32 lessons · 8 subjects · Suggested unit orderView Grade 6 curriculum map →Browse Grade 6 lessons →
Middle School Curriculum Explorer · Grades 6–8
Explore a suggested progression, find a useful next lesson, and make the thinking visible. For parents, homeschool families, tutors and teachers.
A starter map of selected skills, with practice and answers. Science and social studies sequences are suggested; electives and local requirements vary.
Follow a question.
Explain your thinking.
Grade → Subject → Unit → Lesson
Build models, establish evidence habits and connect ideas.
32 lessons · 8 subjects · Suggested unit orderView Grade 6 curriculum map →Browse Grade 6 lessons →Compare explanations, strengthen reasoning and revise with purpose.
32 lessons · 8 subjects · Suggested unit orderView Grade 7 curriculum map →Browse Grade 7 lessons →Synthesize evidence, evaluate alternatives and work more independently.
32 lessons · 8 subjects · Suggested unit orderView Grade 8 curriculum map →Browse Grade 8 lessons →Find a practical next step
Mathematics
Unit 1 · Number magnitude and powers
Estimate an irrational length and communicate quantities using powers of ten.
Mathematics
Unit 2 · Functions and linear systems
Connect a table, graph and equation while distinguishing linear from nonlinear change.
Mathematics
Unit 2 · Functions and linear systems
Use two constraints to solve for two unknown ticket counts.
Mathematics
Unit 3 · Geometry and bivariate evidence
Track vertices through rigid motions and a dilation.
Mathematics
Unit 3 · Geometry and bivariate evidence
Apply right-triangle reasoning and distinguish three round-solid volume formulas.
Mathematics
Unit 3 · Geometry and bivariate evidence
Fit a simple line to paired measurements without claiming a causal result.
English language arts
Unit 1 · Interpreting complexity
Choose the strongest evidence for an interpretation of a character’s mistaken belief.
English language arts
Unit 1 · Interpreting complexity
Analyze how a writer qualifies an initial claim with comparison evidence and a limitation.
English language arts
Unit 2 · Independent writing decisions
Distinguish relevant evidence from an impressive but unrelated fact in a policy argument.
English language arts
Unit 2 · Independent writing decisions
Weigh source authority, distinguish evidence from speculation and organize a bounded explanation.
English language arts
Unit 2 · Independent writing decisions
Use pacing, reflection and a purposeful ending to reshape a short narrative.
English language arts
Unit 3 · Voice and evidence-led decisions
Choose active or passive voice deliberately and revise a group conclusion in light of evidence.
Science
Unit 1 · Systems, Evidence and Variation
Evaluate an ecological argument using paired sites, time patterns and an alternative explanation.
Science
Unit 1 · Systems, Evidence and Variation
Use chromosome-card models to contrast inheritance in sexual and asexual reproduction.
Science
Unit 2 · Energy and Experimental Reasoning
Integrate a simple heating table with a particle model without treating all added energy as rising temperature.
Science
Unit 2 · Energy and Experimental Reasoning
Critique a flawed experimental report and redesign it for interpretable evidence.
Science
Unit 3 · Earth Patterns and Design Decisions
Explain seasonal patterns through axis tilt, sunlight angle and day length.
Science
Unit 3 · Earth Patterns and Design Decisions
Combine design constraints, uncertain results and monitoring in an environmental recommendation.
Social studies
Unit 1 · Patterns and Historical Claims
Distinguish totals, rates and regional variation when interpreting population evidence.
Social studies
Unit 1 · Patterns and Historical Claims
Compare a primary document’s scope with a later explanatory account.
Social studies
Unit 2 · Rights and Government
Connect a constitutional rule to chronology while distinguishing legal protection from universal access.
Social studies
Unit 2 · Rights and Government
Use a constitutional clause and a hypothetical dispute to distinguish delegated powers from a complete legal answer.
Social studies
Unit 3 · Policy and Corroboration
Evaluate a fictional public budget with explicit tradeoffs and an opposing argument.
Social studies
Unit 3 · Policy and Corroboration
Evaluate source dependence and explain what corroboration can and cannot establish.
Visual arts · Elective / rotation
Unit 1 · Visual Arguments and Critique
Use hierarchy and a simple data display to support a clearly limited message.
Visual arts · Elective / rotation
Unit 1 · Visual Arguments and Critique
Choose an artwork for a specific exhibition purpose and acknowledge a credible alternative.
Music · Elective / rotation
Unit 1 · Interpretation and Arrangement
Compare versions of the same rhythm and explain how tempo and dynamics affect an intended interpretation.
Music · Elective / rotation
Unit 1 · Interpretation and Arrangement
Arrange two parts to make a returning motif clear and explain the decisions with an annotated score.
Health and physical education
Unit 1 · Tactical Decisions and Fair Evidence
Use a fictional trial record to defend a strategy while acknowledging its tradeoffs and limits.
Health and physical education
Unit 1 · Tactical Decisions and Fair Evidence
Analyze a spoken argument that mixes useful evidence, an irrelevant detail and an unsupported universal claim.
Technology, computer science and digital literacy · Elective / rotation
Unit 1 · Data Decisions and Digital Claims
Trace a small automated rule and explain why its output depends on the data and criteria chosen.
Technology, computer science and digital literacy · Elective / rotation
Unit 1 · Data Decisions and Digital Claims
Distinguish a factual disagreement from a different interpretation of the same digital-service evidence.