Physics — Algebra and Trigonometry · 35 minutes

Suggested grades 11–12 · Unit 2: Energy and Waves · Lesson 1 of 2

Account for Energy With a Repeatable Algorithm

Construct a paper calculation model that includes transfers outside the chosen mechanical-energy account.

Mr. S Teaches · Original starter lesson · HS-PHYS-03 · Grade range is planning guidance.

Watch, notice, discuss

Video choices for this lesson

2 choices

Preview a video, then choose what fits your learners. “Show to class” opens a larger view; use the player’s play and full-screen controls when you’re ready.

Teacher preview needed. Check the language, level and length before showing. YouTube may show ads or related videos.

After watching

What idea from the video helps you calculate an energy budget and write a repeatable sequence for predicting kinetic energy and speed? Identify one useful example and one limit of the video's model or explanation.

An external player loads only after you choose Preview or Show to class. Playback connects to YouTube. Videos belong to their creators; availability and embedding can change.

Learning objective

Calculate an energy budget and write a repeatable sequence for predicting kinetic energy and speed.

Before you begin

  • Use squares, square roots and gravitational energy mgh.

Gather your materials

  • Paper or notebook
  • Pencil; calculator optional for numerical work; all task data supplied below

Language to know

system boundary
A choice defining what is included in an energy account.
kinetic energy
Energy associated with motion, modeled here as mv²/2.
algorithm
An explicit sequence of steps producing an output from inputs.

Understand the concept

Model account: A 2 kg object begins at rest 10 m above a reference level. Use g=10 m/s². Initial gravitational energy is 200 J. A supplied pathway transfers 50 J from the selected mechanical account to thermal energy in the object and surroundings before the bottom. Predict final kinetic energy by subtracting that transfer, then solve K=mv²/2. The model assumes no other initial energy or transfer; a paper algorithm is a precursor to, not a completed computer simulation.

Teach it step by step

  1. Read the account and list inputs m, g, h and thermal transfer with units.
  2. Write the sequence: calculate mgh, subtract the specified transfer, check that K is nonnegative, then compute speed.
  3. Apply the sequence and draw an energy bar account totaling the initial 200 J.
  4. Explain a gap or inconsistent input, such as transfer greater than available initial energy, rather than taking a square root of a negative K.

Make the thinking visible

Worked example or model response

K=200−50=150 J. Since K=(2v²)/2=v², v=√150≈12.25 m/s. A 200 J initial bar becomes 150 J kinetic plus 50 J transferred from the chosen mechanical account, not 50 J of destroyed energy.

Guided practice

Together run the algorithm for the same object and height with 80 J transferred from the mechanical account.

Independent practice

Write pseudocode or a numbered calculation rule and apply it for h=5 m with 20 J transferred. Identify which measurement would be needed to compare the prediction with a real path.

Quick assessment

Would an algorithm using only height predict the same speed on every real path?

Answer key & assessment criteria

Answers and teaching guidance

  1. Guided: K=120 J and speed √120≈10.95 m/s.
  2. Independent: Initial energy is 100 J; K=80 J; speed √80≈8.94 m/s. A useful test needs motion measurements and evidence about energy transfers or losses from the selected account.
  3. Quick check: No. Path-dependent transfers and other conditions matter; the simple prediction depends on its explicit assumptions.

Look for: Assess the stated objective using the concrete criteria and explanations in the answer key. Invite an alternative supported solution; distinguish a model’s prediction from an established observation.

Make it work for your learner

More support

Use energy bars first and supply the square-root step as a formula card.

Extension challenge

Implement the paper algorithm in a spreadsheet, vary height and transfer independently and explain invalid inputs rather than silently discarding them.

Verified references · Selected contributions

Standards connections

Selected NGSS high school-band contribution; full performance requires additional evidence and instruction.

Subject-content standards

These records identify the part of a subject standard practiced here. Course placement is instructional guidance; the source’s category or band remains authoritative.

Contributes to NGSS performance expectation

HS-PS3-1

NGSS · High school band

Represent changes and transfers in a system’s energy mathematically.

Read the official performance expectation ↗

This supplies an algebraic budget and paper algorithm toward computational modeling. It does not implement or validate a computational model, and only selected energy components are represented.

Verified 2026-11-04. Selected contribution, not full attainment.

Supporting literacy connections

These records apply to the specified reading, writing or communication task. They do not establish subject-content alignment.

Supporting Common Core literacy connection

RST.11-12.1

Common Core · Grades 11–12

Analyze technical details, distinctions and gaps using textual evidence.

Read the official standard ↗

The activity explicitly analyzes the provided technical text, table or model. It contributes selected literacy practice rather than complete grade-band reading coverage or independent subject-content alignment.

Verified 2026-11-04. Selected contribution, not full attainment.