Earth and Environmental Science · 40 minutes

Suggested grades 9–12 · Unit 1: Earth Evidence and Energy · Lesson 2 of 2

Model a Changing Energy Budget

Connect reflection, outgoing radiation and an initial energy imbalance without treating the model as a weather forecast.

Mr. S Teaches · Original starter lesson · HS-EARTH-02 · Grade range is planning guidance.

Watch, notice, discuss

Video choices for this lesson

2 choices

Preview a video, then choose what fits your learners. “Show to class” opens a larger view; use the player’s play and full-screen controls when you’re ready.

Teacher preview needed. Check the language, level and length before showing. YouTube may show ads or related videos.

After watching

What idea from the video helps you construct two energy budgets and explain the direction of the initial change under stated assumptions? Identify one useful example and one limit of the video's model or explanation.

An external player loads only after you choose Preview or Show to class. Playback connects to YouTube. Videos belong to their creators; availability and embedding can change.

Learning objective

Construct two energy budgets and explain the direction of the initial change under stated assumptions.

Before you begin

  • Add and subtract energy quantities.

Gather your materials

  • Paper or notebook
  • Pencil; calculator optional for numerical work; all task data supplied below

Language to know

albedo
The fraction of incoming radiation reflected by a surface or system.
energy imbalance
A difference between energy entering and leaving a chosen system.
feedback
A response that changes the effect of an initial disturbance.

Understand the concept

Idealized budget: Over one interval, 100 model energy units enter Earth’s system; 30 are reflected and 70 leave as outgoing thermal radiation, giving balance. If reflection falls to 25 while outgoing radiation initially remains 70, five units are retained. The system can respond, including through changing outgoing radiation. This short model connects energy flow with a possible warming tendency, not an exact future temperature. Cloud, ice, ocean and atmospheric responses complicate real climate behavior and act on different timescales.

Teach it step by step

  1. Read the budget and draw incoming, reflected and outgoing arrows with distinct labels.
  2. Calculate the original net balance and the perturbed initial balance.
  3. Explain why lower reflection increases absorbed energy under the stated input.
  4. Add one possible response arrow and identify what is missing before predicting an exact temperature change.

Make the thinking visible

Worked example or model response

Original net=100−30−70=0. Perturbed initial net=100−25−70=+5. If a later state reflects 25 and emits 75, that selected budget balances again, but the arithmetic alone does not determine the temperature or time needed to reach it.

Guided practice

Together analyze an initial outgoing-radiation decrease from 70 to 68 while reflection remains 30.

Independent practice

Create two labeled diagrams and a six-sentence explanation. Distinguish an initial energy imbalance, a possible response and a numerical temperature forecast unsupported by the model.

Quick assessment

Would zero net energy imbalance mean Earth’s surface must be at zero degrees?

Answer key & assessment criteria

Answers and teaching guidance

  1. Guided: 100−30−68=+2 units initially retained; balanced flows and absolute temperature are different quantities.
  2. Independent: Require correct arithmetic, explicit stated assumptions, a response mechanism and acknowledgment that temperature conversion/timescale parameters are missing.
  3. Quick check: No. Zero net refers to balanced transfers, not an absolute temperature value.

Look for: Assess the stated objective using the concrete criteria and explanations in the answer key. Invite an alternative supported solution; distinguish a model’s prediction from an established observation.

Make it work for your learner

More support

Use a three-column incoming/reflected/emitted ledger before drawing arrows.

Extension challenge

Compare a reinforcing ice-reflection response with a response that increases outgoing radiation, keeping mechanisms and timescales explicit.

Verified references · Selected contributions

Standards connections

Selected NGSS high school-band contribution; full performance requires additional evidence and instruction.

Subject-content standards

These records identify the part of a subject standard practiced here. Course placement is instructional guidance; the source’s category or band remains authoritative.

Contributes to NGSS performance expectation

HS-ESS2-4

NGSS · High school band

Model links between Earth’s energy flows and climate change.

Read the official performance expectation ↗

This selected energy-flow model contributes mechanistic climate reasoning. It omits detailed climate processes, timescales and empirical validation and cannot produce an exact temperature forecast.

Verified 2026-11-04. Selected contribution, not full attainment.

Supporting literacy connections

These records apply to the specified reading, writing or communication task. They do not establish subject-content alignment.

Supporting Common Core literacy connection

RST.9-10.7

Common Core · Grades 9–10

Translate technical prose into visuals and explain mathematical or visual information.

Read the official standard ↗

The activity explicitly analyzes the provided technical text, table or model. It contributes selected literacy practice rather than complete grade-band reading coverage or independent subject-content alignment.

Verified 2026-11-04. Selected contribution, not full attainment.